Diversity in the Timing of Digit Ossification within the Limb Developmental Bauplan in Caudata

J. R. Hinchliffe, E. I. Vorobyeva, D. N. Mednikov


At the early prechondrogenic stage, within an overall common developmental bauplan, the larval urodele limb provides examples of variation in pattern some of which may be classified as caenogenetic or heterochronic, in some cases clearly adaptive. Comparison of ossification pattern in larval limb development has been relatively neglected. The sequence of ossification along the fore and hindlimb digits was examined in Salamandrella keyserlingii, Onychodactylus fisheri, Triturus vulgaris, and Triturus vittatus. In Onychodactylus and Triturus vittatus in almost all digits the ossification sequence is proximo-distal as in the chondrogenic sequence. In Salamandrella the normal sequence is also proximo-distal, but in the digits of a number of variants the sequence is distal-proximal. In Triturus vulgaris, the sequence is distal-proximal. These differences appear unrelated to phyletic relations or to ecological niche, whether this is rheophilic (Onychodactylus) or limnophilic. The variety of normal sequences together with the frequency of individual variation suggests that the ossification sequence may not be tightly controlled. But the varied patterns of chondrogenesis and digit ossification illustrate the dynamic and varied character of the developmental bauplan of the caudate limb.


Salamandrella keyserlingii; Onychodactylus fisheri; Triturus vulgaris; Triturus vittatus; larval limb development

Full Text:



Alberch P. and Gale E. A. (1985), «A developmental analysis of an evolutionary trend: digital reduction in amphibians», Evolution, 39, 8 – 23.

Borkhvardt V. G. (1994), «Limb development in larvae of Siberian newt, Salamandrella keyserlingii (Amphibia, Hynobiidae)», Zool. Zh., 73, 53 – 67 [in Russian].

Hinchliffe J. R. (2002), «Developmental basis of limb evolution», Int. J. Dev. Biol., 46, 835 – 845.

Hinchliffe J. R. and Vorobyeva E. I. (1999), «Developmental basis of limb homology in urodeles: heterochronic evidence from the primitive hynobiid family», in: Bock W. (ed.), Homology, John Wiley, pp. 95 – 109.

Keller R. (1946), Rev. Suisse Zool., 53, 389.

Kuzmin S. L. (1999), The Amphibians of the Former Soviet Union, Pensoft, Sofia – Moscow.

Shubin N. H. and Wake D. B. (1995), «Implications of direct development for the tetrapod limb bauplan», Am. Zool., 31, 8A.

Vorobyeva E. I. (1999), «The problem of polydactyly in Amphibians», Russ. J. Herpetol., 6(2), 95 – 103.

Vorobyeva E. I., Hinchliffe J. R., and Ol’shevskaya O. P. (1997), «Specific features of development of the paired limbs in Ranodon sibiricus Kessler (Hynobiidae, Caudata)», Ontogenez, 28, 188 – 197 [in Russian].

Vorobyeva E. I. and Hinchliffe J. R. (1998), «Phylogenetic variability and larval adaptations in the developing limbs of hynobiids», Adv. Amphibian Res. Former Soviet Union, 3, 1 – 9.

Vorobyeva E. I. and Mednikov D. N. (2002), «Some specific features in the development and ossification of the limbs skeletal elements of the Triturus vulgaris (Caudata)», Dokl. RAN, 387, 565 – 568 [in Russian].

Wake D. B. and Hanken J. (1996), «Direct development in the lungless salamanders: what are the consequences for developmental biology, evolution and phylogenesis?», Int. J. Dev. Biol., 40, 859 – 869.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30906/1026-2296-2005-12-0-274-278


  • There are currently no refbacks.