Prey Chemical Discrimination in the Lizard Eugongylus albofasciolatus and Its Distribution in Scincidae

William E. Cooper, Jr.

Abstract


Actively foraging lizards tongue-flick while searching for prey, and have evolved strong responsiveness to prey chemicals. This trait is universal among active foragers that have been tested, which can locate and identify prey using only chemical cues sampled by tongue-flicking. In Scincidae, prey chemical discrimination has been confirmed in several species of active foragers, and is absent in a single ambush forager. However, responses to prey chemicals remain untested in large scincid taxonomic groups. When tested experimentally for tongue-flicking and biting in response to chemicals on cotton swabs, Eugongylus albofasciolatus exhibited prey chemical discrimination by responding more strongly than to deionized water and cologne controls. These results extend prey chemical discrimination to a new group of lygosomines, the Eugongylus group. Current evidence suggests that prey chemical discrimination may be universal in Eumecinae, is present in at least one species of Scincinae, and is widespread in Lygosominae, being present in the Eugongylus, Sphenomorphus, and Egernia groups, as well as in actively foraging Mabuya. Although no data are available for Acontinae or Feylininae, it is likely that prey chemical discrimination is plesiomorphic and nearly universal in Scincinae, the exceptions being ambush foragers.

Keywords


behavior; prey chemical discrimination; Tongue; Squamata; Scincidae

Full Text:

PDF

References


Cogger H. C. (1992), Reptiles and Amphibians of Australia, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

Cooper W. E., Jr. (1994), «Chemical discrimination by tongue-flicking in lizards: a review with hypotheses on its origin and its ecological and phylogenetic relationships», J. Chem. Ecol., 20, 439 – 487.

Cooper W. E., Jr. (1994) «Prey chemical discrimination, foraging mode, and phylogeny», in: L. J. Vitt and E. R. Pianka (eds.), Lizard Ecology: Historical and Experimental Perspectives, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, pp. 95 – 116.

Cooper W. E., Jr. (1995), «Foraging mode, prey chemical discrimination, and phylogeny in lizards», Anim. Behav., 50, 973 – 985.

Cooper W. E., Jr. (1997), «Correlated evolution of prey chemical discrimination with foraging, lingual morphology, and vomeronasal chemoreceptor abundance in lizards», Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 41, 257 – 265.

Cooper W. E., Jr. (1998), «Evaluation of swab and related tests as a bioassay for assessing responses by squamate reptiles to chemical stimuli», J. Chem. Ecol., 24, 841 – 866.

Cooper W. E., Jr. (1998), «Prey chemical discrimination indicated by tongue-flicking in the eublepharid gecko Coleonyx variegatus», J. Exp. Zool., 281, 21 – 25.

Cooper W. E., Jr. (1999), «Supplementation of phylogenetically correct data by two species comparison: support for correlated evolution of foraging mode and prey chemical discrimination in lizards extended by first intrageneric evidence», Oikos, 86, 97 – 104.

Cooper W. E., Jr. (2000a), «An adaptive difference in the relationship between foraging mode and responses to prey chemicals in two congeneric scincid lizards», Ethology, 106, 193 – 206.

Cooper W. E., Jr. (2000b), «Food chemical discriminations by the omnivorous scincid lizards Tiliqua scincoides and Tiliqua rugosa», Herpetologica, 56, 208 – 216.

Cooper W. E., Jr. (2000), «Food chemical discriminations by an herbivorous lizard, Corucia zebrata», J. Exp. Zool., 286, 372 – 378.

Cooper W. E., Jr. (2002), «Convergent evolution of plant chemical discrimination by omnivorous and herbivorous scleroglossan lizards», J. Zool. (Lond.), 257, 353–356..

Cooper W. E., Jr. (in press), «Correlated evolution of herbivory and food chemical discrimination in iguanian and ambush foraging lizards», Behav. Ecol.

Cooper W. E., Jr., and Burghardt G. M. (1990), «Volmerolfaction and vomodor», J. Chem. Ecol., 16, 103 – 105.

Cooper W. E., Jr., and Burghardt G. M. (1990), «A comparative analysis of scoring methods for chemical discrimination of prey by squamate reptiles», J. Chem. Ecol., 16, 45 – 65.

Cooper W. E., Jr., and Habegger J. J. (2000), «Elevated tongue-flicking and biting by the insectivorous lygosomine skink Mabuya macularia to prey, but not plant, chemicals», Ethol. Ecol. Evol., 12, 175 – 186.

Cooper W. E., Jr., and Hartdegen R. (2000), «Lingual and biting responses to prey chemicals by ingestively naive scincid lizards: discrimination from control chemicals, time course, and effect of method of stimulus presentation», Chemoecology, 10, 51 – 58.

Cooper W. E., Jr., and Vitt L. J. (2002), «Distribution, extent, and evolution of plant consumption by lizards», J. Zool. (Lond.), 57, 487–517.

Cooper W. E., Jr., Vitt L. J., and Caldwell J. P. (1994), «Movement and substrate tongue flicks in Phyrnosomatid lizards», Copeia, 1994, 234 – 237.

Cooper W. E., Jr., Al-Johany A. M., Vitt L. J., and Habegger J. J. (2000), «Responses to chemical cues from animal and plant foods by actively foraging insectivorous and omnivorous scincine lizards», J. Exp. Zool., 287, 327 – 339.

Cooper W. E., Jr., Perez-Mellado V., Vitt L. J., and Budzynski B. (in press), «Cologne as a pungency control in tests of lizard chemical discriminations».

Dial B. E. and Schwenk K. (1996), «Olfaction and predator detection in Coleonyx brevis (Squamata: Eublepharidae), with comments on the functional significance of buccal pulsing in geckos», J. Exp. Zool., 276, 415 – 424.

Gillingham J. C. and Clark D. L. (1981), «Snake tongue-flicking: transfer mechanics to Jacobson’s organ», Can. J. Zool., 59, 1651 – 1657.

Graves B. M. and Halpern M. (1990), «Roles of vomeronasal organ chemoreception in tongue flicking, exploratory, and feeding behaviour of the lizard, Chalcides ocellatus», Anim. Behav., 39, 692 – 698.

Greer A. E. (1970), «A subfamilial classification of scincid lizards», Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 139, 151 – 184.

Greer A. E. (1979), «A phylogenetic subdivision of Australian skinks», Rec. Austral. Mus., 32, 339 – 371.

Griffith H., Ngo A., and Murphy R. W. (2000), «A cladistic evaluation of the cosmopolitan genus Eumeces Wiegmann (Reptilia, Squamata, Scincidae)», Russ. J. Herpetol., 7(1), 1 – 16.

Hutchinson M. N. (1981) «The systematic relationships of the genera Egernia and Tiliqua (Lacertilia: Scincidae). A review and immunological assessment», in: C. H. Banks and A. A. Martin (eds.), Proc. of the Melbourne Herpetol. Symp., Zoological Board of Victoria, Blackburn, pp. 176 – 193.

Nicoletto P. F. (1985), «The roles of vision and olfaction in prey detection by the skink, Scincella lateralis», J. Herpetol., 19, 411 – 415.

Winer B. J. (1962), Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Zar J. H. (1996), Biostatistical Analysis, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (NJ).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30906/1026-2296-2019-9-%25s-237-242

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.