Distribution and Biogeography of Non-Marine Cretaceous Turtles
Abstract
During the Cretaceous, non-marine turtles show strong patterns of provincialism, mirroring the pattern of land masses resulting from the breakup of Pangea since the Jurassic. These patterns are a result of several factors, of which vicariancy and ecological controls on the distribution of groups of turtles are considered the most significant. The large scale patterns, such as the dominance of pleurodires in the southern land masses, including Africa, South America, and India, and the dominance of Cryptodires in the northern land masses cannot be strictly attributed to vicariancy because exceptions to both distributional patterns are present. The pleurodires in Europe and North America during the Late Cretaceous may reflect the removal of the barriers that prevented the terrestrial faunal interchange between the northern and southern continents. Two groups of cryptodires that occurred in the southern continents during the Cretaceous, the Meiolaniidae and Otwayemys, seem to reflect a widespread distribution of the very primitive cryptodires which were diverse prior to the breakup of Pangea in the Early or possibly Middle Jurassic. In Laurasia, three regions of turtle diversity can be identified, the North American region, the European region, and the Asian region. In the Early Cretaceous, North American region is dominated by members of the Paracryptodira, and the Asian region is dominated by members of the Eucryptodira. Europe includes taxa from both groups. In the Late Cretaceous, Eucryptodires become increasingly more abundant and diverse in North America. The Baenidae which are not found outside North America appears to be truly endemic to this region. Two groups of “modern,” non-marine cryptodires or Chelomacryptodira, the Testudinoidea and the Trionychoidea, appear to have an Asian origin. Both have their earliest record in the Neocomian of Japan.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Andrews C. W. (1920), «Notes on two new species of fossil tortoises», Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 5, 145 – 150.
Benton M. J. and Spencer P. S. (1995), Fossil Reptiles of Great Britain, Chapman and Hall, London.
Bohlin B. (1953), «Fossil Reptiles from Mongolia and Kansu», The Sino-Swedish Exped. Publ., 37, 1 – 113.
Brinkman D. B. (1998), «The skull and neck of the Cretaceous turtle Basilemys (Trionychoidea, Nanhsiungchelyidae), and the interrelationships of the genus», Paludicola, 1, 150 – 157.
Brinkman D. B. and Nicholls E. L. (1991), «Anatomy and relationships of the turtle Boremys pulchra (Testudines: Baenidae)», J. Vertebr. Paleontol., 11(3), 302 – 315.
Brinkman D. B. and Nicholls E. L. (1993), «The skull of Neurankylus eximus (Testudines: Baenidae) and a reinterpretation of the relationships of this taxon», J. Vertebr. Paleontol., 13(3), 273 – 281.
Brinkman D. B. and Peng J.-H. (1993a), «Ordosemys leios, n. gen., n. sp., a new turtle from the Early Cretaceous of the Ordos Basin, Inner Mongolia», Can. J. Earth Sci., 30, 2128 – 2138.
Brinkman D. B. and Peng J.-H. (1993b), «New material of Sinemys (Testudines, Sinemydidae) from the Early Cretaceous of China», Can. J. Earth Sci., 30, 2139 – 2152.
Brinkman D. B. and Peng J.-H. (1996), «A new species of Zangerlia (Testudines: Nanhsiungchelyidae) from the Upper Cretaceous redbeds at Bayan Mandahu, Inner Mongolia, and the relationships of the genus», Can. J. Earth Sci., 33, 526 – 540.
Brinkman D. B. and Wu Xiao-Chun (1999), «The skull of Ordosemys, an Early Cretaceous turtle from Inner Mongolia, People’s Republic of China, and the interrelationships of Eucryptodira (Chelonia, Cryptodira)», Paludicola, 2, 134 – 137.
de Broin F. (1977), «Contribution à l’étude des Chéloniens. Cheloniens continentaux du Crétacé et du Tertiaire de France», Mém. Mus. Natl. d’Hist. Naturelle, C, 38, 1 – 366.
de Broin F. (1988), «Les tortues et le Gondwana. Examen des rapports entre le fractinnement du Gondwana et la dispersion géographique des tortue pleurodires a partir du Crétacé», Studia Geol. Salmanticensia. Vol. 2. Studia Paleocheloniol., 2, 103 – 142.
de Broin F. and de la Fuente M. (1993), «Les tortues fossiles d’Argentine: synthése», Ann. Paléontol., 79, 169 – 232.
Buffetaut E., Costa G., Le Loeuff J., Martin M., Rage J.-C., Valentin X., and Tong H. (1996), An Early Campanian vertebrate fauna from the Villeveyrac Basin (Hérault, Southern France)», Neues Jahrb. Geol. Paläontol., Monatsefte, 1996, 1 – 16.
Case J. A., Martin J. E., Chaney D. S., Reguero M., and Woodburne M. O. (1998), «The first hadrosaur from Antarctica», J. Vertebr. Paleontol., 18(Suppl. to No. 3), 32A.
Chow M. C. (1954), «Cretaceous turtles from Laiyang, Shantung», Acta Palaeontol. Sinica, 2, 395 – 408.
Chkhikvadze V. M. (1985), «Fossil turtles of the family Sinochelyidae», Vestn. Zool., 1985, 40 – 45 [in Russian with English summary].
Chkhikvadze V. M. (1987), «Sur la classification et les caractères de certaines tirtues fossiles d’Asie, rares et peu etudiées», Studia Geol. Salmanticensia. Vol. 2. Studia Paleocheloniol., 2, 55 – 86.
Danilov I. (1999), «A new lindholmemydid genus (Testudines: Lindholmemydidae) from the mid-Cretaceous of Uzbekistan», Russ. J. Herpetol., 6(1), 63 – 71.
Dollo L. (1884), «Priemière note sur les chéloniens de Bernnisart», Bull. Mus. Royal d’Hist. Nat., Belg., 3, 63 – 84.
Evans J. and Kemp T. S. (1975), «The cranial morphology of a new Lower Cretaceous turtle from southern England», Paleontology, 18, 25 – 40.
Evans J. and Kemp T. S. (1976), «A new turtle