Comparative Studies on Lizards Based on the Cranial Osteology of Lacerta media and Laudakia caucasia (Squamata: Sauria)

Nasrullah Rastegar-Pouyani, Mohadeseh Afroosheh

Abstract


In spite of numerous studies done on the morphometric characters of lizards, information about the detailed characters of their skeletons remains insufficient. In this study, the skulls of two different species of lizards, cleared and double-stained, have been examined and compared: Laudakia caucasia Eichwald, 1831 and Lacerta media Lantz and Cyrén, 1920. The aim of this paper is to study the characteristics and peculiarities of the skulls of the two above-mentioned species of lizards in order to facilitate diagnosis and identification of the living species and subfossil remains and to evaluate changes in skull morphology in a phylogenetic context. For doing this, characters of the skull and mandibular elements were studied. The existence of differences between these two genera and families Laudakia caucasia (Agamidae) and Lacerta media (Lacertidae), according to the bone and skull characters, have been explained. The obvious differences that show off are: dimension of the supratemporal fossae, thickness of the individual bones, and head length/width ratio. Other obvious differences are the type of dentition, differences in form, size and special manner of joining bones like existence of differences in lower jaw and braincase architecture, and reviewing some differences in the skulls of two different phylogenetic lines.

Keywords


cranial osteology; skull; dentition; mandible; Laudakia caucasia; Lacerta media

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ananjeva N. B. (1977), «Taxonomic differences in the structure of cranium and dental system in the Agamidae (Sauria) of the fauna of the USSR», Zool. Zh., 56(7), 1062 – 1070 [in Russian].

Ananjeva N. B. (1980), «Besonderheiten im bau des Schädels, Gebisses und Zungenbeins der in der UDSSR vorkommenden Agamen (Lacertilia, Agamidae: Agama)», Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin, 56(2), 295 – 308.

Barahona F. and Barbadillo L. J. (1997), «Identification of some Iberian lacertids using skull characters», Rev. Esp. Herpetol., 11, 47 – 62.

Barahona F., López-Jurado L. F., and Mateo J. A. (1998), «Estudio anatómico del esqueleto en el género Gallotia (Squamata: Lacertidae)», Rev. Esp. Herpetol., 12, 69 – 89.

Bell C. J., Evans S. E., and Maisano J. A. (2003), «The skull of the gymnophthalmid lizard Neusticurus ecpleopus (Reptilia: Squamata)», Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 139, 283 – 304.

d’Bellaris A. A. and Kamal A. M. (1981), «The chondrocranium and the development of the skull in recent reptiles», in: C. Gans and T. Parsons (eds.), Biology of the Reptilia, Acad. Press, New York, pp. 1 – 263.

Cooper W., Habegger J., and Espinoza R. (2001), «Responses to prey and plant chemicals by three iguanian lizards: relationships to plant in the diet», Amphibia–Reptilia, 22, 349 – 361.

Cope E. D. (1892), «The osteology of the Lacertilia», Proc. Am. Philos. Soc., 13, 185 – 221.

Cope E. D. (1900), «The crocodilians, lizards and snakes of North America», Ann. Rep. U.S. Natl. Mus., 1898, 153 – 1270.

Estes R., de Queiroz K., and Gauthier J. (1988), «Phylogenetic relationships within Squamata», in: R. Estes and G. Pregill (eds.), Phylogenetic Relationships of the Lizard Families. Essays Commemorating Charles L. Camp, Stanford Univ. Press, Palo Alto (CA), pp. 119 – 281.

Etheridge R. and de Queiroz K. (1988), «A phylogeny of Iguanidae», in: R. Estes and G. Pregill (eds.), Phylogenetic Relationships of the Lizard Families. Essays Commemorating Charles L. Camp, Stanford Univ. Press, Palo Alto (CA), pp. 283 – 367.

Faizi H. and Rastegar-Pouyani N. (2007), «Further studies on the lizard cranial osteology, based on a comparative study of the skull in Trachylepis aurata transcaucasica and Laudakia nupta (Squamata: Sauria)», Russ. J. Herpetol., 14, 107 – 116.

Gaupp E. (1891), «Die Columella der kionokranen Saurier», Anat. Anz., 6, 107 – 117.

Herrel A., Peter A., Jeannine F., and Frits D. (1999), «Morphology of the feeding system in agamid lizards, ecological correlates», Anat. Rec., 254, 496 – 507.

Huey R. B. and Pianka E. R. (2007), «Historical introduction: On widely foraging for Kalahari lizards», in: S. M. Reilly, L. D. McBrayer, and D. B. Miles (eds.), Lizard ecology. The Evolutionary Consequences of Foraging Mode, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (UK), pp. 1 – 10.

Jollie M. T. (1960), «The head skeleton of the lizard», Acta Zool., 41, 1 – 64.

Kardong K. V. (2002), Vertebrates: Comparative Anatomy, Function, Evolution, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Kent G. C. and Miller J. L. (2000), Comparative Anatomy of the Vertebrates, McGraw-Hill, New York.

McBrayer L. D. (2004), «The relationship between skull morphology, biting performance and foraging mode in Kalahari lacertid lizards», Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 140, 403 – 416.

Moody S. M. (1980), Phylogenetic and Historical Biogeographical Relations of the Genera in the Family Agamidae (Reptilia: Lacertilia). Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (MI).

Müller J. (2002), «Skull osteology of Parvilacerta parva, a small-sized lacertid lizard from Asia Minor», J. Morphol., 253, 43 – 50.

Oelrich T. M. (1956), «The anatomy of the head of Ctenosaura pectinata (Iguanidae)», Univ. Michigan Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool., 94, 1 – 122.

Parker W. K. (1880), «On the structure and development of the skull in the Lacertilia. I. On the skull of the common lizards (Lacerta agilis, L. viridis, and Zootoca vivipara)», Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Biol., 170, 595 – 640.

Parker W. K. (1881), «On the structure of the skull in the chameleons», Trans. Zool. Soc. Lond., 11, 77 – 105.

Rastegar-Pouyani N. (1999a), Systematics and Biogeography of Iranian Plateau Agamids (Sauria: Agamidae). Ph.D. Thesis, Göteborg University, Göteborg.

Rastegar-Pouyani N. and Nilson G. (2002), «Taxonomy and biogeography of the Iranian species of Laudakia (Sauria: Agamidae)», Zool. Middle East, 26, 93 – 122.

Regal P. J. (1978), «Behavioral differences between reptiles and mammals: an analysis of activity and mental capabilities», in: N. Greenberg and P. D. MacLean (eds.), Behavior and Neurobiology of Lizards, Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare, Washington, pp. 183 – 202.

Rieppel O. (1984), «The cranial morphology of the fossorial lizard genus Dibamus with a consideration of its phylogenetic relationships», J. Zool., 204, 289 – 327.

Romer A. S. (1956), Osteology of the Reptiles, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Romer A. S. and Parsons T. S. (1977), The Vertebrate Body. Fifth Edition.

Schwenk K. (2000), «Feeding in Lepidosaurs», in: K. Schwenk (ed.), Feeding, Acad. Press, San Francisco, pp. 175 – 291.

Siebenrock F. (1892), «Zur Kenntnis des Kopfskelettes des Scincoiden, Anguiden und Gerrhosuriden», Ann. K. K. Naturhist. Hofmus. Wien, 7, 163 – 196.

Siebenrock F. (1893a), «Das Skelett von Uroplates fimbriatus Schneid»., Ann. K. K. Naturhist. Hofmus. Wien, 8, 517 – 536.

Siebenrock F. (1893b), «Das Skelett von Brookesia superciliaris», Kuhl. Sitz. Akad. Wiss. Wien, 102, 73 – 118.

Siebenrock F. (1894), «Skelett der Lacerta simonyi Steind. und der Lacertiden familie überhaupt», Kuhl. Sitz. Akad. Wiss. Wien, 103, 205 – 292.

Siebenrock F. (1895), «Das Skelett der Agamidae», Kuhl. Sitz. Akad. Wiss. Wien, 104, 1089 – 1196.

Stayton T. C. (2005), «Morphological evolution of the lizard skull: A geometric morphometrics survey», J. Morphol., 263(1), 47 – 59.

Taylor W. R. (1967), «An enzyme method of clearing and staining small vertebrates», Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus., 122, 1 – 17.

Torres-Carvajal O. (2003), «Cranial osteology of the Andean lizard Stenocercus guentheri (Squamata: Tropiduridae) and its postembryonic development», J. Morphol., 255, 94 – 113.

Underwood G. L. (1971), A Modern Appreciation of Camp’s Classification of the Lizards, Soc. for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles.

Versluys J. (1898), «Die mittlere und äussere Ohrsphäre der Lacertilia und Rhynchocephalia», Zool. Jb. Anat., 12, 161 – 406.

Zug G. R. and Crombie R. I. (1970), «Modifications of the Taylor method of clearing and staining for amphibians and reptiles», Herpetol. Rev., 2, 49 – 50.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30906/1026-2296-2011-18-1-17–28

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


You can subscribe to the print or electronic version of the journal on the site of EastView Company. If you have any questions, please write to the email sales@ivis.ru